The infrastructure
behind review.
Prove is the user-facing verification product. Structured outputs and monitoring patterns extend the same evidence discipline into organizational workflows.
Prove: the review surface
Prove is where a person starts with a claim, URL, or piece of media and keeps the question visible while examining it. The useful unit is not a floating label. It is a record that holds the original wording, relevant context, sources, and the reasoning behind a result.
That makes the product useful for an initial investigation, a second look, or a handoff. Read the cited material rather than treating an output as a substitute for it.
Open ProveEvidence-ready outputs
Organizations often need a review result to travel beyond the original screen. A durable record should keep the claim, the source references, the time of review, and the unresolved questions together. It should also make correction possible when a source changes or a reviewer notices a mismatch.
We design this layer around inspectability rather than a single confidence number. The right output depends on the task: a lead for a researcher is different from a conclusion that is published automatically. Teams considering structured integrations should bring their workflow, source boundaries, and review responsibilities to the conversation.
DESIGNED FOR INTRODUCTIONSVerification agents
Agents can watch a defined stream and route notable claims to a human workflow. Scope is part of the design: what feeds are visible, what counts as a signal, which languages and claim types are in view, and who owns the next decision.
A useful alert carries its trigger and enough context to be dismissed, deferred, or escalated. It should not quietly rank some claims out of existence, invent confirmation, or answer for the reviewer. Monitoring is an early-warning layer, not an editorial authority.
Read the noteCapability is not certainty.
We do not present a source trail as proof that an event occurred. We present it as material for a better decision. Synthetic-media signals and provenance records have scope; they should not be stretched into claims they never made.